| 1. | Suwen ( 素 问 ) is a sub - school of collation school . second ， we made a general analysis to 195 cases of collating and exegetics of suwen ( 素 问 ) made by hushu ( 胡 澎 ) 、 yuyue ( 俞 樾 ) 、 sunyirang ( 孙 诒 让 ) 、 yuchang ( 于 鬯 ) ， and compared them with the contents of textural research of the exegetic school in the former part of the dissertation
第二，本文研究方法首先是对胡澎、俞樾、孙诂让、于鬯的195条《素问》校释实例进行了全面分析，并与“注释派”的考证内容进行了比较。
|
| 2. | So ， this dissertation focused on these main ways of traditional chinese philology ， such as the ways of philology ， phonology and exegetics ， and basing on the particularity of medicine documents ， summed up roundly a system of the ways of anhui - school plain - ology about collating and exegetics of suwen ( 素 问 ) from five angles - the way of distinguishing the forms ， the way of discussing the pronunciations ， the way of explaining the meanings ， the way of collation ， the way of explaining the medical principles ， and by comparing it with the exegetic school ， made a farther summarization to the characteristics of the collative school from such ways - the style of study ， the spirit of study and the way of study ， etc
论文从五个角度全面归纳了皖派朴学《素问》校诂的方法体系:辨形方法、考音方法、释义方法、校勘方法、释医理方法。在比较“注释派”的基础上，本文从治学风格、治学精神、治学方法诸方面，进一步总结了校诂派的独到特色。第四，中国学术史上的“汉宋之争”是形成《素问》校诂派与注释派的重要学术背景因素。
|
| 3. | The people who studied neijing ( 内 经 ) historieally can be classified as two sorts ? the exegetes in collation and exegetes in commentaries of medicine books . the former such as duanyucai ( 段 玉 裁 ) 、 hushu ( 胡 澎 ) 、 yuyue ( 俞 樾 ) 、 sunyirang ( 孙 诒 让 ) 、 yuchang ( 于 鬯 ) , who belonged to anhui school of the experts in plain - ology ， paid their attentions to textual researeh for contextual contents as their style of study ， and the latter sueh as wangbing ( 王 冰 ) 、 wukun ( 吴 昆 ) 、 zhangjiebin ( 张 介 宾 ) 、 mashi ( 马 莳 ) 、 zhangzhicong ( 张 志 聪 ) ， who all were famous physicians ， paid their attentions to the explaining of medical principles as their style of study . a famous professor of the conteeporary era ， qianchaochen ( 钱 超 尘 ) ， pointed out clearly that there are two schools in the exegetical history of neijing ( 内 经 ) - the collative school and the exegetic school . but up to date ， in the field of chinese medicine ， the collative school has been short of being studied . this dissertation mainly study the collative school ， and select suwen ( 素 问 ) collative school ， which is consisted of hushu ( 胡 澎 ) 、 yuyue ( 俞 樾 ) 、 sunyirang ( 孙 诒 让 ) 、 yuchang ( 于 鬯 ) , as the object to discuss the far - reaching influence of plain - ology to the study of medical documents
历史上研究《内经》的群体主要有两大类:校勘训诂家类和医学注释家类。前者以段玉裁、胡澎、俞樾、孙诒让、于鬯等皖派朴学家为核心力量，治学风格上偏于文理的考证;后者以王冰、吴昆、张介宾、马莳、张志聪等医学大家为主要代表，治学风格上偏于医理的解释。当代著名医学文献研究专家钱超尘则明确提出了“校诂派”与“注释派”两大派别概念。
|
| 4. | Then ， in order to open out the difference of the ways of their study between the collative school and the exegetic school ， we have introduced 53 typical cases of textual research ， which separately belong to five parts - distinguishing the forms ， discussing the pronunciations ， explaining the meanings ， collation ， explaining the medical principles ， in the latter part of dissertation ， and introduced every case by the order - [ original text ] [ collation and exegesis of past years ] [ textual research of anhui school ] [ commentary ]
论文下篇则选择了53例典型的考证释例，分辨形例、考音例、释义例、校勘例、释医理例五个部分，逐条按原文、历代校注、皖派考释、评析进行介绍，以展示“校诂派”与“注释派”的治学方法的差异。
|